4.0 Article

Structure and Properties of Films and Coatings Made of a Styrene-Butadiene Thermoplastic Elastomer

期刊

RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 334-345

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S199079312202021X

关键词

antibacterial coatings; films of styrene-butadiene composition with polylactide; composition structure; adhesive properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the connection between the antibacterial surface properties and the structure and composition of coatings made from a styrene-butadiene thermoplastic elastomer, polylactide, and antibacterial agents. The research demonstrates that the antibacterial action of the coating is based on the release of antibacterial agents in an aqueous environment along with microorganisms. The leaching process is influenced by the structural organization of the coating and is enhanced by incorporating antibacterial agents in the hydrolyzed phase of the polylactide.
This study is devoted to the establishment of the connection of antibacterial surface properties with the structure and composition of coatings based on a styrene-butadiene thermoplastic elastomer with polylactide and antibacterial agents: tetramethylenediethylenetetramine or distearyldimethylammonium chloride. It is shown that the mechanism of antibacterial action of the composition is based on the leaching (release) of antibacterial agents in an aqueous environment together with microorganisms. The effect depends on the structural organization of the coating, which accelerates their leaching and is enhanced by the inclusion of antibacterial agents in the hydrolyzed phase of the polylactide, which is localized in the styrene-butadiene matrix around the polystyrene domains. The features of the structure of the films and coatings are established by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using a paramagnetic probe, physical and mechanical parameters, and by studying the laws of thermal destruction using thermogravimetry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据