4.5 Article

Energy substrate utilization with and without exogenous carbohydrate intake in boys and men exercising in the heat

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 121, 期 5, 页码 1127-1134

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00535.2016

关键词

children; substrate utilization; exercise; heat; hydration; stable isotope

资金

  1. Brazilian Research Council (CNPq), Science without Borders
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator Salary Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known about energy yield during exercise in the heat in boys compared with men. To investigate substrate utilization with and without exogenous carbohydrate (CHOexo) intake, seven boys [ 11.2 +/- 0.2 (SE) yr] and nine men (24.0 +/- 1.1 yr) cycled (4 X 20-min bouts) at a fixed metabolic heat production (H-p) per unit body mass (6 W/kg) in a climate chamber (38 degrees C and 50% relative humidity), on two occasions. Participants consumed a C-13-enriched 8% CHO beverage (CARB) or placebo beverage (CONT) in a double-blinded, counterbalanced manner. Substrate utilization was calculated for the last 60 min of exercise. CHOexo oxidation rate (2.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.2 mg.kg fat-free mass(-1) .min(-1), P = 0.02) and CHOexo oxidation efficiency (12.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 16.0 +/- 0.9%, P = 0.01) were lower in boys compared with men exercising in the heat. Total carbohydrate (CHOtotal), endogenous CHO (CHOendo), and total fat (Fat(total)) remained stable in boys and men (P > 0.05) during CARB, whereas CHOtotal oxidation rate decreased (P < 0.001) and Fattotal oxidation rate increased over time similarly in boys and men during CONT (P < 0.001). The relative contribution of CHOexo to total energy yield increased over time in both groups (P < 0.001). In conclusion, endogenous substrate metabolism and the relative contribution of fuels to total energy yield were not different between groups. The ingestion of a CHO beverage during exercise in the heat may be as beneficial for boys as men to spare endogenous substrate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据