4.7 Article

Potential contributions of wind and solar power to China's carbon neutrality

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106155

关键词

China; Carbon neutrality; Wind power; Solar power; Electricity demand

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41991235]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Tech-nology Research Program [JCYJ20180302150417674]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1502803]
  4. China Strategic priority research program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19070503]
  5. China Scholarship Council [201806010309]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

China's goal of being carbon-neutral by 2060 can be achieved by deploying wind and solar capacity of approximately 2495 GW and 2674 GW respectively within flexible and optimized grids. This would meet about 67% of electricity demands for all sectors by 2050, reduce significant amounts of SO2 and NOx emissions, and secure a green energy supply for the country.
China's goal of being carbon-neutral by 2060 requires a green electric power system dominated by renewable energy. However, the potential of wind and solar alone to power China remains unclear, hindering the holistic layout of the energy development plan. Here, after taking temporal matching of supply and demand (60 min), land use, and government policy into account and assuming lossless transmission, we demonstrate that deploying wind and solar capacity of 2495 and 2674 GW, respectively, within flexible and optimized grids can meet ~67% of electricity demands by all society sectors for 2050 (~6.3% curtailment rate), even without other costly power sources or storage. Spatially explicit configurations of the grids are provided simultaneously to support this achievement. The resulting green electricity supply of 10.4 PWh per year help secure China's carbon-neutral goal and reduces 2.08 Mt SO2 and 1.97 Mt NOx emissions annually. Our findings recommend policymakers accelerate exploiting complementary wind and solar power as the dominant source of energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据