4.8 Article

Ferroptosis regulation by the NGLY1/NFE2L1 pathway

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2118646119

关键词

ferroptosis; NRF1; cancer

资金

  1. Stanford ChEM-H Chemistry/Biology Interface Predoctoral Training Program
  2. Grace Science Foundation
  3. Stanford Cancer Institute Award
  4. NIH [R01CA227942, U01 CA226051-01A1, R01GM122923]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cytosolic peptide: N-glycanase 1 (NGLY1) and nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 1 (NFE2L1/NRF1) work together to enhance the resistance of ferroptosis, a form of nonapoptotic cell death induced by oxidative stress. This is achieved by promoting the expression of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), an enzyme that plays a key role in protecting cells from ferroptosis. These findings suggest that NGLY1-catalyzed deglycosylation of NFE2L1 may regulate ferroptosis sensitivity.
Ferroptosis is an oxidative form of nonapoptotic cell death whose transcriptional regulation is poorly understood. Cap'n'collar (CNC) transcription factors including nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 1 (NFE2L1/NRF1) and NFE2L2 (NRF2) are important regulators of oxidative stress responses. NFE2L1 abundance and function are regulated posttranslationally by N-glycosylation. Functional maturation of NFE2L1 requires deglycosylation by cytosolic peptide:N-glycanase 1 (NGLY1). We find that NGLY1 and NFE2L1 work in a common pathway to enhance ferroptosis resistance, independent of NFE2L2, by promoting expression of the key antiferroptotic enzyme glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4). Enhanced ferroptosis sensitivity in NFE2L1-knockout cells can be reverted by expression of an NFE2L1 mutant containing eight asparagine-to-aspartate protein sequence substitutions, which mimic NGLY1-catalyzed protein sequence editing. These results suggest that ferroptosis sensitivity may be regulated by NGLY1-catalyzed NFE2L1 deglycosylation. These results highlight a role for the disease-associated NGLY1/NFE2L1 pathway in ferroptosis regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据