4.7 Article

Application of machine learning methods on dynamic strength analysis for additive manufactured polypropylene-based composites

期刊

POLYMER TESTING
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107580

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Machine learning; Polypropylene-based composites; Dynamic strength; Prediction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51905555]
  2. Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University [2019CX017]
  3. Hu-Xiang Youth Talent Program [2018RS3002, 2020RC3009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study applied machine learning methods to analyze the dynamic strength of 3D-printed polypropylene-based composites, evaluating six different algorithms for their performance. Artificial neural network showed high prediction accuracy but low computational efficiency, while support vector regression provided satisfactory prediction with good accuracy and efficiency. Extreme gradient boosting and random forest approaches were recommended for importance of input.
This study aimed at applying machine learning (ML) methods to analyze dynamic strength of 3D-printed polypropylene (PP)-based composites. The dynamic strength of additive manufactured PP-based composites with different fillers and printing parameters was investigated by split Hopkinson pressure bars. Based on experimental results, six machine learning approaches were applied to express the relationships between the dynamic strength and materials as well as printing parameters. The performance of the six machine learning algorithms with relatively small training datasets was evaluated. The comparison results showed that artificial neural network could achieve the highest prediction accuracy but with relatively low computational efficiency, whereas the support vector regression could provide satisfactory prediction with both good accuracy and efficiency. The extreme gradient boosting and random forest approaches were recommended if the importance of input was required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据