3.8 Article

A geometric principle of indifference

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED LOGIC
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 54-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jal.2016.05.002

关键词

Concepts; Conceptual spaces; Degrees of belief; Principle of indifference; Vagueness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

That one's degrees of belief at any one time obey the axioms of probability theory is widely regarded as a necessary condition for static rationality. Many theorists hold that it is also a sufficient condition, but according to critics this yields too subjective an account of static rationality. However, there are currently no good proposals as to how to obtain a tenable stronger probabilistic theory of static rationality. In particular, the idea that one might achieve the desired strengthening by adding some symmetry principle to the probability axioms has appeared hard to maintain. Starting from an idea of Carnap and drawing on relatively recent work in cognitive science, this paper argues that conceptual spaces provide the tools to devise an objective probabilistic account of static rationality. Specifically, we propose a principle that derives prior degrees of belief from the geometrical structure of concepts. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Ethics

Accessing medical biobanks to solve crimes: ethical considerations

Nina F. de Groot, Britta C. van Beers, Lieven Decock, Gerben Meynen

Summary: This article discusses the ethical issues of using human bodily material in medical biobanks for crime investigation and prosecution purposes, addressing concerns such as confidentiality, trust, autonomy, and justice. The author suggests the need to balance the importance of crime solving with protecting individual rights, and emphasizes the necessity of further research on these issues to provide ethical guidance.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2021)

Article Ethics

Conceptual change and conceptual engineering: the case of colour concepts

Lieven Decock

Summary: The case of colour concepts serves as a precise standard for measuring concept improvement, but also highlights issues with controlling conceptual engineering. Varying degrees of optimization, design, and control are possible in the change of colour concepts, with implications for other classes of concepts. This suggests that conceptual engineering is a limit case of conceptual change.

INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2021)

Review Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Cognitive Metaphysics

Lieven Decock

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2018)

Article Philosophy

Quine's Strictly Vegetarian Analyticity

Lieven Decock

MONIST (2017)

Article Philosophy

What Verities May Be

Igor Douven, Lieven Decock

Article Psychology, Experimental

Measuring Graded Membership: The Case of Color

Igor Douven, Sylvia Wenmackers, Yasmina Jraissati, Lieven Decock

COGNITIVE SCIENCE (2017)

Proceedings Paper History & Philosophy Of Science

Conceptual Spaces as Philosophers' Tools

Lieven Decock, Igor Douven

APPLICATIONS OF CONCEPTUAL SPACES: THE CASE FOR GEOMETRIC KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION (2015)

Article Philosophy

What Is Graded Membership?

Lieven Decock, Igor Douven

Article Philosophy

Knowledge and Approximate Knowledge

Lieven Decock, Igor Douven, Christoph Kelp, Sylvia Wenmackers

ERKENNTNIS (2014)

Article Philosophy

Qualia Compression

Lieven Decock, Igor Douven

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH (2013)

Article Logic

Vagueness: A Conceptual Spaces Approach

Igor Douven, Lieven Decock, Richard Dietz, Paul Egre

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC (2013)

Article History & Philosophy Of Science

Constraints on Colour Category Formation

Yasmina Jraissati, Elley Wakui, Lieven Decock, Igor Douven

INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2012)

Article Philosophy

Putnam's Internal Realism: A Radical Restatement

Lieven Decock, Igor Douven

TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY (2012)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Similarity After Goodman

Lieven Decock, Igor Douven

REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY (2011)

暂无数据