4.7 Article

Slow intrinsic growth rate in forest elephants indicates recovery from poaching will require decades

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 153-159

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12764

关键词

conservation; demography; forest elephants; illegal killing; Loxodonta cyclotis; mortality; poaching; population growth rate; population recovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

African forest elephants Loxodonta cyclotis are experiencing persistent declines driven by illegal killing and range loss. Despite the importance for policy debates regarding elephant trade managed through the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), little is known about forest elephant demography and, consequently, the impacts of offtake and subsequent population recovery potential. Using 23years of individually based demographic data from Dzanga, Central African Republic, we found low reproductive potential resulting from annual birth rates averaging 43% (SD: 14%), a median inter-birth interval of 68months and a median primiparous age of 23years. Average mortality was 31% per year (SD: 10%) during the study, with approximately 14% of that attributed to human killing. This population of forest elephants demonstrated concerningly slow growth rates, with a doubling time of nearly 60years under current conditions (41years excluding human impacts), amounting to three times that reported for savanna elephants. As such, forest elephants appear to be significantly more sensitive to human-induced mortality than their congeneric species. Such slow intrinsic growth challenges current perceptions of historic and contemporary ivory trade impacts on forest elephants, highlighting the urgent need to stem poaching and institute long-term protective measures.Policy implications. Debates regarding the sustainability of the ivory trade for the species appear to have overestimated growth rates of forest elephants. The information presented here indicates that sustainable offtake models for forest elephants need reassessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据