4.8 Article

Dali server: structural unification of protein families

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 W1, 页码 W210-W215

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac387

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein structure is crucial for understanding biological function, and recent advancements in deep learning have revolutionized the field of structural bioinformatics. The Dali server for protein structure comparison has been upgraded to allow searching for foldomes of key organisms in the AlphaFold Database and to provide annotated structural alignments with protein families.
Protein structure is key to understanding biological function. Structure comparison deciphers deep phylogenies, providing insight into functional conservation and functional shifts during evolution. Until recently, structural coverage of the protein universe was limited by the cost and labour involved in experimental structure determination. Recent breakthroughs in deep learning revolutionized structural bioinformatics by providing accurate structural models of numerous protein families for which no structural information existed. The Dali server for 3D protein structure comparison is widely used by crystal-lographers to relate new structures to pre-existing ones. Here, we report two most recent upgrades to the web server: (i) the foldomes of key organisms in the AlphaFold Database (version 1) are searchable by Dali, (ii) structural alignments are annotated with protein families. Using these new features, we discovered a novel functionally diverse subgroup within the WRKY/GCM1 clan. This was accomplished by linking the structurally characterized SWI/SNF and NAM families as well as the structural models of the CG-1 family and uncharacterized proteins to the structure of Gti1/Pac2, a previously known member of the WRKY/GCM1 clan. The Dali server is available at http://ekhidna2.biocenter.helsinki.fi/dali. This website is free and open to all users and there is no login requirement. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据