4.5 Article

Adaptive Graph Regularized Deep Semi-nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Data Representation

期刊

NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS
卷 54, 期 6, 页码 5721-5739

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11063-022-10882-x

关键词

Matrix factorization; Data representation; Graph regularized; Deep semi-NMF; Adaptive graph; Geometric structure; Optimal graph; Clustering

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61603159, 62162033, U21B2027, 61902160]
  2. Yunnan Provincial Major Science and Technology Special Plan Projects [202002AD080001, 202103AA080015]
  3. Yunnan Foundation Research Projects [202101AT070438, 202101BE070001-056]
  4. Excellent Key Teachers of QingLan Project in Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An adaptive graph regularized deep semi-nonnegative matrix factorization (AGRDSNMF) algorithm is proposed in this work, which can effectively utilize the intrinsic local structure among data and achieve encouraging clustering performance.
Recently, matrix factorization-based data representation methods exhibit excellent performance in many real applications. However, traditional deep semi-nonnegative matrix factorization (DSNMF) models the relationship between samples by predefining a fixed graph, which is not optimal and thus cannot exploit the intrinsic local structure among data effectively. In this work, an adaptive graph regularized deep semi-nonnegative matrix factorization (AGRDSNMF) algorithm is proposed for data representation. This proposed AGRDSNMF method can construct an adaptive optimal graph in each layer, whose weights are automatically determined by the probabilities between neighborhood samples. Then the adaptive graph regularizer of each layer is adopted to constrain the corresponding coefficient matrix during decomposition. Therefore, AGRDSNMF can capture the geometric structure of the representation in each layer. Experiments are conducted on COIL20, PIE, and TDT2 datasets, and our AGRDNSMF algorithm can achieve encouraging clustering performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据