Efficacy and safety of avacopan in Japanese patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: A subanalysis of a randomized Phase 3 study

Objectives This subgroup analysis of the randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 ADVOCATE study evaluated the efficacy and safety of avacopan compared with tapered prednisone in Japanese patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Methods Patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) or granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) received either avacopan 30 mg twice daily for 52 weeks plus prednisone-matching placebo or tapered prednisone over 20 weeks plus avacopan-matching placebo for 52 weeks. The two primary efficacy endpoints were clinical remission at Week 26 and sustained remission at Week 52. Results Compared with the overall population (N = 330), Japanese patients (N = 21) were older and had worse renal function, and a higher proportion were female and had MPA. The proportion of Japanese patients with clinical remission at Week 26 was 9/11 (81.8%) with avacopan vs. 7/10 (70.0%) with prednisone (overall population: 72.3% vs. 70.1%) and with sustained remission at Week 52 was 8/11 (72.7%) vs. 4/10 (40.0%), respectively (overall population: 65.7% vs. 54.9%). The safety profile of avacopan was similar in Japanese patients and the overall study population. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of avacopan in Japanese patients with MPA or GPA were comparable to that observed in the overall ADVOCATE study population.

Automated summary

This subgroup analysis of the ADVOCATE study shows that the efficacy and safety of avacopan in Japanese patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis are comparable to those observed in the overall study population.