4.7 Article

Oilothermal, a novel pyrolysis method for fabrication of carbon dots-loaded carriers from cyanobacteria for use in solid-phase extraction of cadmium

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104210

关键词

oilothermal; pyrolysis; cyanobacteria; carbon dots; cadmium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, carbon dots-loaded carriers (CLCs) were fabricated using cyanobacterial cells and an oilothermal method. The CLCs showed high adsorption capacity, fast adsorption rate, and green origin, making them potentially useful for solid-phase extraction of trace cadmium.
Background: Making carbon dots-loaded carriers (CLCs) required the use of two types of precursors (one for carrier particles and the other for carbon dots) and at least three steps. In this study, CLCs were fabricated by using cyanobacterial cells as a dual-purpose precursor and oilothermal as an innovative pyrolysis method. Methods: The oilothermal method allowed that each cyanobacterial cell (carrier particle precursor) with its hydrous exopolysaccharides (EPSs) layer (carbon dots precursor) to be encapsulated together by an oil micelle and pyrolyzed separate from other cells and formed the CLC in one step. The potential of emerging CLCs for solid-phase extraction (SPE) was assessed. For this purpose, the CLCs were tested in a cadmium based model.Significant findings: The range of the maximum pH-dependent adsorption efficiency (>95%) was extensive (pH 4-10). The adsorption kinetics and isotherm had the best fit with the pseudo-second-order and Langmuir linear models, respectively. The adsorption capacity was 5305.61 mg kg-1 only in 2 min exposure time. The findings in this research conclude that emerging CLCs, because of their unique features such as high capacity, fast adsorption rate, fast recovery rate, green origin, optimal and efficient fabrication method, have a high potential for SPE of trace cadmium.(c) 2022 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据