4.6 Review

Editors' Choice-Review-Designing Defects and Diffusion through Substitutions in Metal Halide Solid Electrolytes

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac5bad

关键词

Solid-State Ionics; Batteries; Energy Storage

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  2. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at NREL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ternary metal halides A (3) MX (6) are promising solid electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. Chemical substitutions can effectively control the material properties, but a cohesive understanding of the design principles is lacking. Further research is needed to study the influence of substituting ions on crystal structure and material properties.
Ternary metal halides A (3) MX (6), (A = Li+, Na+; M = trivalent metal; X = halide) are a promising family of solid electrolytes for potential applications in all-solid-state batteries. Recent research efforts have demonstrated that chemical substitution at all three sites is an effective strategy to controlling battery-relevant material properties. The A (3) MX (6) family exhibits a wide breadth of structure and anion sublattice types, making it worthwhile to comprehend how chemical substitutions manifest desirable functional properties including ion transport, electrochemical stability, and environmental tolerance. Yet, a cohesive understanding of the materials design principles for these substitutions have not yet been developed. Here, we bring together prior literature focused on chemical substitutions in the A (3) MX (6) ternary metal halide solid electrolytes. Using materials chemistry perspectives and principles, we aim to provide insights into the relationships between crystal structure, choice of substituting ions and the extent of substitutions, ionic conductivity, and electrochemical stability. We further present targeted approaches to future substitution studies to enable transformative advances in A (3) MX (6) solid electrolytes and all-solid-state batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据