4.2 Article

A Simple HPLC-MS/MS Method for Determination of Tryptophan, Kynurenine and Kynurenic Acid in Human Serum and its Potential for Monitoring Antidepressant Therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 37-44

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkw071

关键词

-

资金

  1. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [8151037001000001]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [2014J4100135]
  3. Bureau of traditional Chinese medicine research project of Guangdong [20141220]
  4. Guangzhou municipal medical Science and Technology project [20161A011037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kynurenine pathway, in which tryptophan is metabolized to kynurenine and kynurenic acid, has been linked to depression. A rapid and highly reproducible liquid-chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method were established for determining tryptophan, kynurenine and kynurenic acid in human serum. Biological samples were precipitated with methanol before separation on an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18. The stable-isotope-labeled internal standards (kynurenine-(C4N)-C-13-N-15 and kynurenic acid-d5) were used for quantification. Detection was performed using multiple reaction monitoring in electrospray ionization mode at m/z 205.1 -> 188.1 for tryptophan, m/z 209.1 -> 146.1 for kynurenine, m/z 190.1 -> 144.1 for kynurenic acid. Good linearity of analyte to internal standard peak area ratios was seen in the concentration range 1,000-50,000 ng/mL for tryptophan, 100-5,000 ng/mL for kynurenine and 1-60 ng/mL for kynurenic acid. Pooled drugfree human serum was purified using activated charcoal and the method was shown to be linear, with validation parameters within acceptable limits. The newly developed method was successfully used to determine concentrations of tryptophan, kynurenine and kynurenic acid in serum from 26 healthy volunteers and 54 patients with depression. Concentrations of tryptophan and kynurenine were lower in serum from depressed individuals than from healthy individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据