4.3 Review

O Alcohol consumption and liver cancer risk: a meta-analysis

期刊

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 1205-1231

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-015-0615-3

关键词

Alcohol; Liver cancer; Meta-analysis; Dose-risk relationship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alcohol is a confirmed risk factor of liver cancer. Yet, its dose-response function and synergistic effects with other risk factors remain unclear. We performed a meta-analysis on publications up to May 2014. A total of 112 publications were identified. The meta-relative risk (mRR) and the dose-response trend were calculated. Tests for heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analyses were performed. The synergy index (SI) was recorded or calculated, whenever possible. Compared to individuals who never drank or drank at very low frequencies, the mRR for ever drinkers was 1.29 (95 % confidence interval, CI 1.16-1.42) and 1.46 (95 % CI 1.27-1.65) for case-control studies, and 1.07 (95 % CI 0.87-1.27) for cohort studies. Being a current drinker was associated with an increased liver cancer risk in case-control studies (mRR = 1.55, 95 % CI 0.38-2.73), but not in cohort studies (mRR = 0.86, 95 % CI 0.74-0.97). The dose-response relation between alcohol and liver cancer was apparent with RR = 1.08 (95 % CI 1.04-1.11) for 12 g/day (similar to 1 drink), 1.54 (95 % CI 1.36-1.74) for 50 g/day, 2.14 (95 % CI 1.74-2.62) for 75 g/day, 3.21 (95 % CI 2.34-4.40) for 100 g/day, and 5.20 (95 % CI 3.25-8.29) for 125 g/day of alcohol consumption. There were synergistic effects of alcohol consumption with hepatitis (S = 2.14, 95 % CI 1.31-2.98) and with diabetes (S = 3.57, 95 % CI 2.29-4.84) on the risk of liver cancer, although this may be subject to publication bias. Overall, one alcoholic drink per day (similar to 12 g/day) may be associated with a 1.1 times higher liver cancer risk. Further studies on the synergistic effects of alcohol consumption and other major risk factors are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据