4.7 Article

DFT investigations of KTiOPO4Mx (M = K, Na, and Li) anodes for alkali-ion battery

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 156, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0090071

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21703036, 21773030]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2021J01547]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the properties of KTiOPO4Mx (M = K, Na, and Li; x = 0.000-1.000) as an anode for PIBs, SIBs, and LIBs were investigated using density functional theory calculations and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. The results reveal that KTiOPO4 shows superior electrochemical performance as an anode for PIBs compared to SIBs and LIBs, in terms of average voltage and ion diffusion kinetics. Furthermore, the KTiOPO4 anode exhibits high structural stability, and alkali ion intercalation contributes to accelerating ion diffusion during the charging process.
The properties of KTiOPO4Mx (M = K, Na, and Li; x = 0.000-1.000) as an anode for potassium-ion batteries (PIBs), sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), and lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are investigated by density functional theory calculations. Our work reveals that the electrochemical performance of KTiOPO4 as an anode for PIBs is superior to that for SIBs and LIBs, in terms of average voltage and ion diffusion kinetics. The ab initio molecular dynamics simulations indicate that the KTiOPO4Mx anode exhibits high structural stability, and alkali ion intercalation contributes to accelerating ion diffusion during the charging process. Particularly, the low activation energy of 0.406 eV of K migration on surface KTP(210), obtained by the climbing-image nudged elastic band method, suggests a high-rate capability. The systematical comparison of the performance of KTiOPO4 as an anode for PIBs, SIBs, and LIBs on the theoretical perspective clarifies that a large channel is not always promising for small radius ion intercalation and diffusion. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据