4.5 Review

Tubulin isotypes - functional insights from model organisms

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 135, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.259539

关键词

Isotype; Microtubule; Tubulin

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB-1846262]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microtubule cytoskeleton is built from alpha- and beta-tubulin subunits, along with other family members, and their role in microtubule function has been relatively unclear. Model organisms provide insights into the mechanisms of tubulin isotypes and their impact on the cytoskeleton's functional and biological diversity.
The microtubule cytoskeleton is assembled from the alpha- and beta-tubulin subunits of the canonical tubulin heterodimer, which polymerizes into microtubules, and a small number of other family members, such as gamma-tubulin, with specialized functions. Overall, microtubule function involves the collective action of multiple alpha- and beta-tubulin isotypes. However, despite 40 years of awareness that most eukaryotes harbor multiple tubulin isotypes, their role in the microtubule cytoskeleton has remained relatively unclear. Various model organisms offer specific advantages for gaining insight into the role of tubulin isotypes. Whereas simple unicellular organisms such as yeast provide experimental tractability that can facilitate deeper access to mechanistic details, more complex organisms, such as the fruit fly, nematode and mouse, can be used to discern potential specialized functions of tissue- and structure-specific isotypes. Here, we review the role of alpha- and beta-tubulin isotypes in microtubule function and in associated tubulinopathies with an emphasis on the advances gained using model organisms. Overall, we argue that studying tubulin isotypes in a range of organisms can reveal the fundamental mechanisms by which they mediate microtubule function. It will also provide valuable perspectives on how these mechanisms underlie the functional and biological diversity of the cytoskeleton.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据