4.1 Article

Non-isothermal viscoelastic melt spinning with stress-induced crystallization: numerical simulation and parametric analysis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL POLYMER PROCESSING
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 25-37

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/ipp-2021-4033

关键词

multi-mode Phan-Thien and Tanner (PTT) constitutive model; operating conditions; stress-induced crystallization; viscoelastic simulation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan from Ministry of Science and Technology [2016YFB0302701]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2232021A-10, 2232021D-36]
  3. Graduate Student Innovation Fund of Donghua University [CUSFDH-D-2021050]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61903078]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [19ZR1402300]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper considers a model of melt spinning with stress-induced crystallization and proposes a computationally efficient algorithm for solving the model. The simulation results are consistent with the experimental data, and a parametric analysis reveals the effects of operating conditions on spinning dynamics and final properties.
This paper considers a model of melt spinning with stress-induced crystallization, where the melt uses the Phan Thien-Tanner model, and the solid adopts the rubber elastic model. We design a computationally efficient algorithm for solving the model. The temperature, radius, and birefringence profile in low-speed and high-speed spun PET fibers were predicted and compared with the published experimental data. The simulation results are consistent with the experimental data from the literature. Then a parametric analysis is conducted to investigate the effects of operating conditions on the spinning dynamics and reveal the relationship between the operating conditions and the final properties. The change of take-up speed has a significant influence on the crystallinity and birefringence of the fiber.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据