4.7 Article

Identification of Neoantigens in Cancer Cells as Targets for Immunotherapy

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052594

关键词

neoantigens; ICB; vaccines

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [21K16278, 19K07653]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21K16278, 19K07653] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clinical benefits of immune checkpoint blockage therapy have been widely reported and it has been shown to enhance antitumor cytotoxic T cells. Neoantigens derived from tumor somatic mutations are believed to be ideal immune targets. Identifying neoantigens can help predict immunotherapy effectiveness and targeting them can be an innovative strategy for cancer treatment.
The clinical benefits of immune checkpoint blockage (ICB) therapy have been widely reported. In patients with cancer, researchers have demonstrated the clinical potential of antitumor cytotoxic T cells that can be reinvigorated or enhanced by ICB. Compared to self-antigens, neoantigens derived from tumor somatic mutations are believed to be ideal immune targets in tumors. Candidate tumor neoantigens can be identified through immunogenomic or immunopeptidomic approaches. Identification of neoantigens has revealed several points of the clinical relevance. For instance, tumor mutation burden (TMB) may be an indicator of immunotherapy. In various cancers, mutation rates accompanying neoantigen loads may be indicative of immunotherapy. Furthermore, mismatch repair-deficient tumors can be eradicated by T cells in ICB treatment. Hence, immunotherapies using vaccines or adoptive T-cell transfer targeting neoantigens are potential innovative strategies. However, significant efforts are required to identify the optimal epitopes. In this review, we summarize the recent progress in the identification of neoantigens and discussed preclinical and clinical studies based on neoantigens. We also discuss the issues remaining to be addressed before clinical applications of these new therapeutic strategies can be materialized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据