4.7 Article

Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody-Based Multianalyte ELISA for Furaltadone Metabolite, Malachite Green, and Leucomalachite Green in Aquatic Products

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 42, 页码 8054-8061

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03233

关键词

furaltadone metabolite; malachite green; leucomalachite green; bispecific monoclonal antibody; multianalyte immunoassay; ELISA

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271866]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB720803]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2014A050503059]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Program of Guangzhou [2014J4100185]
  5. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [S2012010010323, 2014A030311043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new multianalyte immunoassay was designed to screen furaltadone metabolite 5-morpholinomethyl-3-amino-2-oxazolidone (AMOZ), malachite green (MG), and leucomalachite green (LMG) in aquatic products using a bispecific monoclonal antibody (BsMAb). Gradient drug mutagenesis methods were separately used to prepare an anti-3nitrobenzaldehyde-derivatized AMOZ (3-NPAMOZ) hybridoma cell line that was hypoxanthine-guanine-phosphoribosyl-transferase (HGRPT) deficient and an anti-LMG hybridoma cell line that was thymidine kinase (TK) deficient. BsMAb recognizing 3-NPAMOZ and LMG was generated using hybrid-hybridomas of HGRPT and TK deficient cell lines. For AMOZ and LMG, respectively, the BsMAb-based indirect competitive ELSIA (ic-ELISA) values of 1.7 ng/mL and 45.3 ng/mL and detection limits of 0.2 ng/mL and 4.8 ng/mL. To establish the ic-ELISA, 3-NPAMOZ derivatized from AMOZ with 3-nitrobenzaldehyde and LMG reduced from MG by potassium borohydride was recognized by BsMAb. Recoveries of. AMOZ, MG, and LMG in aquatic products were satisfactory and correlated with HPLC analysis. Thus, the multianalyte ic-ELISA is suitable for rapid quantification of AMOZ, MG, and LMG in aquatic products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据