4.2 Article

Integrated petrophysical and lithofacies studies of lower-middle Miocene reservoirs in Belayim marine oil field, Gulf of Suez, Egypt

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 331-344

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.02.007

关键词

Miocene; Kareem formation; Belayim formation; 3D slicing; Gulf of Suez

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reservoir parameters (total gross thickness, shale volume, total porosity, effective porosity, water saturation, bulk pore volume, net pay thickness and oil in place indicator) of Kareem and Belayim formations are studied through nine wells and mapped to show the aerial distribution of these parameters. Interpretation of these maps showed that, the best locations of hydrocarbon accumulation in Belayim marine oil field are middle part, northeast and the south west directions for Kareem formation and southwest and northeast directions for Belayim formation. The petrophysical results of Belayim formation were presented in the form of 3D slicing models to exhibit the variation of these parameters in the different directions. Cross plots of Kareem formation were done using neutron, density and sonic logs which is directly influenced by the matrix composition. By using two or three porosity logs reading we determined the porosity and evaluated the matrix characteristics of Kareem formation as it is considered as a good reservoir for oil and gas and mainly composed of sand stone. Finally, facies maps for Kareem and Belayim formations which established using composite logs indicate that, the environment of deposition of Kareem formation was deep marine in the middle and northern parts and shallow in the southern parts of the study area, meanwhile in Belayim formation the environment of deposition was in lagoonal through the deposition of Baba and Feiran members and shallow to deep during the sedimentation of Sidri and Hammam Faraun members. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据