4.7 Article

Quality of life assessment of cabozantinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the CELESTIAL trial

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 91-98

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.021

关键词

Cabozantinib; Carcinoma; Hepatocellular; Liver neoplasms; Patient health questionnaire; Patient Reported; Outcome Measures; Quality-adjusted life years; Visual analog scale

类别

资金

  1. Ipsen
  2. Exelixis
  3. UCLH Biomedical Research Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the impact of cabozantinib versus placebo on health-related quality of life in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The results showed that cabozantinib had a significant positive effect on health utility scores throughout the follow-up period, indicating a greater quality-adjusted life years for patients receiving cabozantinib. These findings support the favorable benefit-risk profile of cabozantinib in previously treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Background: The CELESTIAL trial (NCT01908426) demonstrated overall survival benefit for cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who had received prior sorafenib treatment. This analysis of CELESTIAL compared the impact of cabozantinib versus placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Materials and methods: Health status was assessed using the EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire over the 800-day follow-up period. EQ-5D-5L health states were mapped to health utility scores using reference values for the UK population. Qualityadjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated for each treatment group as the area under the curve for the plot of health utility score over time. The between-treatment group difference in restricted mean QALYs was calculated by generalized linear models and adjusted for baseline differences. A difference of 0.08 in health utility score (or in QALY) was deemed a minimally important difference and to be clinically significant. Results: At week 5, the difference in mean health utility score between cabozantinib and placebo was -0.097 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: - 0.126, -0.067; p < 0.001). Betweengroup differences in health utility scores diminished over time and were generally nonsignificant. The cabozantinib group accrued more QALYs than the placebo group over follow-up. Differences in mean QALYs (cabozantinib minus placebo) were statistically and clinically significant, ranging from +0.092 (95% CI: 0.016, 0.169) to +0.185 (95% CI: 0.126, 0.243) in favour of cabozantinib, depending on the reference value set used. Conclusions: These HRQoL findings support a positive benefit-risk profile for cabozantinib in previously treated patients with aHCC. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据