4.6 Article

This is what we know: Assessing the stock status of the data-poor common sole on the Iberian coast

期刊

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2022.107747

关键词

Data-limited fisheries; Stock assessment; LBI; LBSPR; Mean length Z; Solea solea

资金

  1. ERDF, Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities - State Research Agency [RTI2018- 099868-B-I00]
  2. GAIN (Xunta de Galicia), GRC MERVEX [IN607-A 2018-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the status of the common sole in the Iberian Coast region using three different length-based methods. The results indicate that this stock is being exploited at the maximum sustainable yield level, with good conservation of immature individuals but a relatively low proportion of large mature individuals.
In the Iberian Coast region, the common sole (Solea solea) is considered a very relevant species due to its high commercial value. Despite its importance, the current status of this stock is still poorly known due to the scarcity of available data to apply formal assessment methods. In data-poor situations length-based methods have been widely applied to estimate biological parameters and to understand the dynamics of marine stocks. In this study we evaluate the status of common sole in the Iberian Coast region using the following three different length based methods: (1) the length-based indicators, (2) the length-based spawning potential ratio and (3) the mean length-based mortality estimators. Overall, the three methods agree that this stock appears to be exploited at the maximum sustainable yield level, the immatures are well preserved whereas the proportion of large mature individuals is relatively low, although it has been increased in the last years. Assessing the status of this valuable stock through data-limited methods is the first step towards designing and implementing effective management measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据