4.7 Article

Evaluation of membrane tailored with biocompatible halloysite-polyaniline nanomaterial for efficient removal of carcinogenic disinfection by-products precursor from water

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112408

关键词

Carcinogenic precursor removal; Nanotubes; Halloysite-polyaninline; Membrane wettability; Humic acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of HNTs-PANI improved the performance of mixed matrix membranes with enhanced HA removal efficiency and good antifouling properties.
Humic acid (HA) is the main component of natural organic matter that generates carcinogenic by-products during disinfection and its removal from water resources is challenging. Biocompatible halloysite (HNTs) nanomaterial decorated with polyaniline (HNTs-PANI) was synthesized via polymerization technique. HNTsPANI was added to prepare polyethersulfone mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). The influence of HNTs-PANI concentration on HA removal efficiency was studied by varying the HNTs-PANI (0.5, 1 and 1.5 wt%). The characterization studies of MMMs revealed that the addition of HNTs-PANI improved the morphology of the membranes, surface properties, chemical stability and thermal property. The amine and hydroxyl groups within the MMMs improved the membrane wettability. The addition of HNTs-PANI within the MMMs had significantly enhanced the pure water flux and HA filtration. YHP2 MMM with 1 wt% of HNTs-PANI demonstrated sieving coefficient of 0.10 and the highest HA removal efficiency of 91% greater than the neat PES membrane. Furthermore, the antifouling property of the MMMs was studied using HA as foulant. 1 wt% of HNTs-PANI added MMM showed a high flux recovery ratio (94.9%) with low total fouling of 12% and low irreversible fouling of 5%, respectively. Thus, HNTs-PANI was an efficient nanomaterial for enhancing the pure water flux, removal efficiency and antifouling property to treat water contaminated with HA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据