4.6 Article

MicroRNA miR-155 inhibits cyprinid herpesvirus 3 replication via regulating AMPK-MAVS-IFN axis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2021.104335

关键词

miR-155; CyHV-3; AMPK; MAVS; Type I interferon

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31725026, 31972832]
  2. Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture Project [NT2021008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that miR-155 is significantly upregulated in common carp brain cells upon CyHV-3 infection and that overexpression of miR-155 can effectively inhibit CyHV-3 replication and promote the expression of type I interferon. The study also finds that miR-155 targets the 3' UTR of AMPK mRNA and that AMPK can interact with and degrade MAVS, resulting in reduced interferon expression.
Since emerged in the late 1990s, cyprinid herpesvirus 3 (CyHV-3) has caused huge economic losses in common and koi carp culture worldwide. Accumulating evidences suggest that teleost fish microRNA (miRNA), a class of non-coding RNA of similar to 22 nucleotides, can participate in many cellular processes, especially in host antiviral defenses. However, the roles of miRNAs in CyHV-3 infection are still unclear. Here, using high-throughput miRNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) verification, we found that miR-155 was significantly upregulated in common carp brain (CCB) cells upon CyHV-3 infection. Overexpression of miR-155 effectively inhibited CyHV-3 replication in CCB cells and promoted type I interferon (IFN-I) expression. Further study revealed that miR-155 targeted the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of the mRNA of 5' AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and that AMPK could interact with and degrade the mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS), resulting in the reduction of interferon (IFN) expression. Collectively, our results show that miR155, induced by CyHV-3 infection, exhibits anti-CyHV-3 activity via regulating AMPK-MAVS-IFN axis, which will help design anti-CyHV-3 drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据