4.7 Article

Unlock the secret of air blowing in developing high strength and superhydrophobic membranes for membrane distillation

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 527, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2022.115579

关键词

Spray-assisted nonsolvent induced phase separation; Superhydrophobic surface; High strength membrane; Desalination; Membrane distillation

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, China [MOST 110-2222-E-011-022-MY3]
  2. Ministry of Education, Taiwan, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel method was used to successfully produce superhydrophobic PVDF membranes with high mechanical strength. The resulting membrane showed excellent performance in treating hypersaline dye wastewater.
Superhydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes with high mechanical strength are highly desirable for multiple applications. Nevertheless, they can hardly be fabricated using conventional phase separation technologies without post-treatment. In this work, the goal has been achieved by a novel spray-assisted non-solvent induced phase separation (SANIPS) method with the aid of air blowing. Without any membrane modification, a superhydrophobic membrane (water contact angle: 166.0 degrees, water sliding angle: 20.0 degrees) with excellent mechanical strength (maximum tensile strength: 3.09 MPa, maximum tensile strain: 104.80%, and Young's modulus: 71.29 MPa) can be produced. The resultant membrane exhibits a remarkable liquid entry pressure of 3.25 bar, and a stable direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performance over 400 h when being subjected to a hypersaline dye wastewater. The newly developed method has been compared with conventional nonsolvent induced phase separation (NIPS) and vapor induced phase separation (VIPS) methods to reveal its underlying mechanism. We believe this work would shed a new light on large scale production of PVDF membranes with both high strength and superhydrophobicity for clean water production via membrane distillation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据