4.7 Article

On comparison of three multi-feed osmotic-mediation-based configurations for brine management: Techno-economic optimization and exergy analysis

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 525, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115517

关键词

Desalination; Reverse osmosis; Zero liquid discharge; Minimum liquid discharge; Techno-economic optimization; Exergy analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the performance of three units (LSRRO, SF-CFRO, and SB-CFRO) and their implementation in a modified membrane system for dewatering hypersaline streams. The optimized systems can achieve high salinities and reduce water cost, with varying specific energy consumption. The findings also suggest the appropriate inlet for different influent salinities.
This study aims at analyzing the performance of three units known as low salt rejection reverse osmosis (LSRRO), split-feed counterflow reverse osmosis (SF-CFRO), and split-brine counterflow reverse osmosis (SB-CFRO) and implementing them in a modified multi-stage multi-feed counter-current membrane with cascade recycle for dewatering hypersaline streams to the salinity appropriate for crystallizers' feed. Exergy and primitive pinch analysis showed that dewatering is limited in SF-CFRO as the permeate inlet dictates the maximum salinity difference at the pinch point as well as high frictional pressure loss in the permeate channel. SB-CFRO and LSRRO units can reach high salinities by increasing permeate to concentrate flow rate and salt permeability, respectively but their efficiency drops due to transport-stemming exergy destruction. Optimizing the multi-stage systems showed that SB-CFRO, LSRRO, and SF-CFRO implemented systems can dewater 70 g/L influent to 234 g/L effluent with unit water cost of 3.44, 3.77, and 3.63 $/m(3) and with corresponding specific energy consumption of 8.66, 16.82, and 9.47 kWh/m(3), respectively. Furthermore, it was shown that the influent with salinity less than 70 g/L should be delivered to the first inlet while at higher salinities up to 90 g/L it should be given to the second inlet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据