4.2 Article

Analysis of cashmere goat meat by label-free proteomics shows that MYL3 is a potential molecular marker of meat toughness

期刊

CZECH JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
卷 67, 期 4, 页码 137-146

出版社

CZECH ACADEMY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.17221/61/2021-CJAS

关键词

SWATH; interaction network; muscle fibre type

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Projects of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [2020ZD0004]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFD200900]
  3. Key Technology Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [2020GG0030]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology [2022YB032]
  5. Sci-entific Research Fund of Animal Science and Technology College of Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology [DK202101]
  6. Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Hebei Province [QN2022165]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used label-free proteomics to analyze the protein content in different muscles of Inner Mongolia cashmere goat, and identified differentially expressed proteins related to muscle development and fatty acid metabolism.
The Inner Mongolia cashmere goat is famous for its bright white cashmere fibre. However, little attention is given to the excellent characteristics of this breed's meat. We used label-free proteomics to analyse the total protein content in five different muscles, and 1 227 proteins were detected. Through sequential windowed acquisition of all theoretical fragment ions (SWATH), 16, 33, 49, 39, and 31 differentially expressed proteins were successfully detected in the five muscles. Protein-protein interaction network analysis of differentially expressed proteins revealed many strong interactions related to fatty acid beta oxidation and muscle development. Based on SWATH in five muscles, 25 differentially expressed proteins related to muscle development were detected, including seven muscle fibre analysis of MYL3 showed that the proportion of MYL3 may be a potential molecular marker for muscle toughness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据