4.7 Article

Comprehensive investigation of reclaimed carbon fibre reinforced polyamide (rCF/PA) filaments and FDM printed composites

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109646

关键词

A; Carbon fibre; A; Recycling; B; Mechanical properties; Fused deposition modelling (FDM)

资金

  1. Ningbo S&T bureau under Collaboration Project [2017D10033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of fibre content on the thermal and mechanical properties as well as porosity of reclaimed carbon fibre reinforced polyamide-6 (rCF/PA) filaments were analyzed. It was found that the samples with 20 wt% and 30 wt% fibre content exhibited the best mechanical performance, with the optimal 20 wt% samples showing a significantly higher tensile strength and modulus compared to unreinforced PA. However, the mechanical properties of the 40 wt% samples dropped significantly due to factors such as fountain flow, poor fibre alignment, and high porosity.
Reclaimed carbon fibre reinforced polyamide-6 (rCF/PA) filaments were prepared and deposited as test coupons with up to 40 wt% fibres under processing conditions derived using melt flow index and printing parameters. The effect of fibre content on the thermal properties, fibre length, fibre orientation, tensile properties, porosity and fracture morphologies was analysed. Overall, the 20 wt% and 30 wt% samples exhibited the best mechanical performance although the latter showed greater variability associated with fibre breakage. The tensile strength and modulus of the optimal 20 wt% coupons were improved by up to 175% (to 150 MPa) and 329% (to 7.8 GPa) respectively, compared with unreinforced PA and indicated a high degree of fibre alignment, relatively high degree of crystallinity, and low porosity ( 6%). Notably, the mechanical performance of the 40 wt% composites dropped significantly as a result of fountain flow, poor fibre alignment and high porosity ( 20%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据