4.8 Article

Formation of the Metastable MnIII Water Oxidation Intermediate in Birnessite is Controlled by a Dissolution-Deposition Process Involving Labile MnII

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202200062

关键词

mixed metal oxides; complexation; manganese; reactive intermediates; water splitting

资金

  1. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI)
  2. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at RPI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research focuses on the catalytic efficiency of birnessite in the water oxidation reaction, investigating the formation mechanism of the key Mn-III intermediate influenced by various electrolyte components. The study reveals that electrolyte cations control the interlayer spacing, while electrolyte anions regulate the deprotonation level, both ultimately affecting the shuttling efficiency of uncomplexed Mn-II and its oxidation to Mn-III.
Birnessite, the closest naturally occurring analog of the Mn4CaO5 cluster of photosystem II, is an important model compound in the development of bio-inspired electrocatalysts for the water oxidation reaction. The present work reports the formation mechanism of the key Mn-III intermediate realized through the study of the effects of several electrolyte anions and cations on the catalytic efficiency of birnessite. In situ spectroelectrochemical measurements show that the activity is controlled by a dynamic dissolution-oxidation process, wherein Mn-III is formed through the oxidation of labile uncomplexed Mn-II that reversibly shuttles between the birnessite and the electrolyte in a manner similar to the photoactivation in photosystem II. The role of electrolyte cations of different ionic radii and hydration strengths is to control the interlayer spacing, whereas electrolyte anions control the extent of deprotonation of complexed Mn-II in the lattice. Both in turn govern the shuttling efficiency of uncomplexed Mn-II and its subsequent electro-oxidation to Mn-III.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据