4.7 Article

A scalable model of fluid flow, substrate removal and current production in microbial fuel cells

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 291, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132686

关键词

Microbial electrochemical technologies; Mathematical modelling; Computational fluid dynamics; Pilot-scale; Microbial fuel cells

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/R51309X/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mathematical modelling is increasingly used in microbial electrochemical technologies to reduce design costs and time. A scalable model is presented for simulating fluid flow and bioelectrochemical processes in microbial fuel cells, benchmarked against an experimental bioreactor. The model describes substrate transport and biofilm growth, and reveals significant spatial variations in both substrate concentration and current density.
Mathematical modelling can reduce the cost and time required to design complex systems, and is being increasingly used in microbial electrochemical technologies (METs). To be of value such models must be complex enough to reproduce important behaviour of MET, yet simple enough to provide insight into underlying causes of this behaviour. Ideally, models must also be scalable to future industrial applications, rather than limited to describing existing laboratory experiments. We present a scalable model for simulating both fluid flow and bioelectrochemical processes in microbial fuel cells (MFCs), benchmarking against an experimental pilot-scale bioreactor. The model describes substrate transport through a two-dimensional fluid domain, and biofilm growth on anode surfaces. Electron transfer is achieved by an intracellular redox mediator. We find significant spatial variations in both substrate concentration and current density. Simple changes to the reactor layout can greatly improve the overall efficiency, measured in terms of substrate removal and total current generated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据