4.6 Article

Linking theoretical and simulation approaches to study fluids in nanoporous media: Molecular dynamics and classical density functional theory

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117383

关键词

Confined fluid; Nanoporous media; Molecular dynamics; Density functional theory; Grand canonical ensemble; Competitive adsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an approach that combines classical density functional theory (DFT) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to investigate the behavior of fluids in nanopores in contact with bulk fluid. The approach involves a DFT calculation of fluid composition and density distribution in a nanopore under specified thermodynamic conditions, followed by an MD simulation of the confined system. The results show good agreement between theory and simulation, confirming the applicability of the proposed method.
We propose an approach that combines classical density functional theory (DFT) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to study fluid behavior in nanopores in contact with bulk fluid (macropores). The approach consists of two principal steps: a DFT calculation of fluid composition and density distribution in a nanopore under specified thermodynamic conditions and an MD simulation of the confined system with obtained characteristics. Thus, we investigate an open system in a grand canonical ensemble. This method allows us to identify both structural and dynamic properties of confined fluid at given bulk con-ditions. Our approach does not require a computationally expensive simulation of a bulk reservoir. This work presents equilibrium density profiles of pure methane, ethane and carbon dioxide and their binary mixtures in slit-like nanopores with carbon walls. Good agreement between the structures obtained by theory and simulation confirms the applicability of the proposed method. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据