4.7 Article

8C-like cells capture the human zygotic genome activation program in vitro

期刊

CELL STEM CELL
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 449-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2022.01.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. EMBO Fellowship [ALTF 355-2019]
  2. Charles and Katharine Darwin Research Fellowship at Darwin College
  3. Donald Higham Fund at Peterhouse College
  4. University of Cambridge
  5. BBSRC [BBS/E/B/000C0422, BB/T007044/1]
  6. Wellcome for a Collaborative Award in Science [220379/Z/20/Z]
  7. Wellcome Trust Investigator award [210754/Z/18/Z]
  8. BBSRC [BB/T007044/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Wellcome Trust [220379/Z/20/Z, 210754/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study discovered human 8-cell-like cells (8CLCs) among naive embryonic stem cells, which transcriptionally resemble the 8-cell human embryo. These cells express markers and elements associated with embryonic development, providing important insights into early events in human embryogenesis.
The activation of the embryonic genome marks the first major wave of transcription in the developing organism. Zygotic genome activation (ZGA) in mouse 2-cell embryos and 8-cell embryos in humans is crucial for development. Here, we report the discovery of human 8-cell-like cells (8CLCs) among naive embryonic stem cells, which transcriptionally resemble the 8-cell human embryo. They express ZGA markers, including ZSCAN4 and LEUTX, and transposable elements, such as HERVL and MLT2A1. 8CLCs show reduced SOX2 levels and can be identified using TPRX1 and H3.Y marker proteins in vitro. Overexpression of the transcription factor DUX4 and spliceosome inhibition increase human ZGA-like transcription. Excitingly, the 8CLC markers TPRX1 and H3.Y are also expressed in ZGA-stage 8-cell human embryos and may thus be relevant in vivo. 8CLCs provide a unique opportunity to characterize human ZGA-like transcription and might provide critical insights into early events in embryogenesis in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据