4.7 Review

Cancer combination therapies by angiogenesis inhibitors; a comprehensive review

期刊

CELL COMMUNICATION AND SIGNALING
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12964-022-00838-y

关键词

Angiogenesis; Tumor; Anti-angiogenic agents; Combination therapy; Resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abnormal vasculature is a prominent characteristic of tumor tissue, contributing to tumor immune evasion. Angiogenesis blockade therapy, which aims to disrupt the vascular network and deprive malignant cells of nutrients and oxygen, has been developed. However, cancer cells often develop resistance to anti-angiogenic agents, resulting in enhanced invasiveness and metastasis. This article focuses on the clinical developments of angiogenesis blockade therapy in combination with other conventional treatments, such as immunotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, and cancer vaccines.
Abnormal vasculature is one of the most conspicuous traits of tumor tissue, largely contributing to tumor immune evasion. The deregulation mainly arises from the potentiated pro-angiogenic factors secretion and can also target immune cells' biological events, such as migration and activation. Owing to this fact, angiogenesis blockade therapy was established to fight cancer by eliminating the nutrient and oxygen supply to the malignant cells by impairing the vascular network. Given the dominant role of vascular-endothelium growth factor (VEGF) in the angiogenesis process, the well-known anti-angiogenic agents mainly depend on the targeting of its actions. However, cancer cells mainly show resistance to anti-angiogenic agents by several mechanisms, and also potentiated local invasiveness and also distant metastasis have been observed following their administration. Herein, we will focus on clinical developments of angiogenesis blockade therapy, more particular, in combination with other conventional treatments, such as immunotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, and also cancer vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据