4.3 Article

Characteristics of Transmitted Drug-Resistant HIV-1 in Recently Infected Treatment-Naive Patients in Japan

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000861

关键词

Japan; BED assay; recent infection; transmitted drug-resistant HIV

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan [H25-AIDS-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Progress in antiretroviral treatment has led to fewer virological failure cases, but 10%-20% of treatment-naive HIV/AIDS cases are reported to harbor drug-resistant strains, suggesting transmission of drug-resistant HIV. We aimed to determine the trend in prevalence of transmitted drug-resistant (TDR) HIV in Japan, particularly in recently infected patients. Methods: Drug-resistance test was performed on 3904 HIV-1-infected cases newly diagnosed between 2007 and 2012. The number of cases infected within 6 months [recent seroconverters (RS)] was estimated by BED assay of 2700 plasma samples. Characteristics of RS cases were further analyzed. Results: The overall prevalence of TDR was 9.1%, ranging from 7.3% in 2008% to 12.5% in 2010. Among 1403 subtype B/E/D cases with >50 CD4(+) T cell counts and >1000 HIV copies per milliliter, 468 (33.4%) were estimated to be RS. The prevalence of RS was significantly higher among cases who were male, Japanese, and men who have sex with men. The prevalence of TDR did not differ significantly between recent and long-term seroconverters (8.5% vs. 9.2%, respectively, P = 0.68). Common mutations in both groups were M46I/L and T215 revertants. Furthermore, sequences with these mutations, K103N and D30N/N88D formed clusters on phylogenetic trees. Conclusion: Our study clarified an increase in prevalence of TDR in Japan from 2007 to 2012. The phylogenetic clustering of cases with M46I/L or T215 revertants suggests that HIV with these mutations have become circulating strains. Furthermore, detailed analyses showed that Japanese men who have sex with men are more aware of their risk of HIV infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据