4.7 Article

Dynamic slow feature analysis and random forest for subway indoor air quality modeling

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 213, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108876

关键词

Indoor air quality; Latent variable; Random forest; Slow feature analysis; Soft sensor

资金

  1. Opening Project of Guangxi Key Labo-ratory of Clean Pulp and Papermaking and Pollution Control, China [2021KF11]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2021MF135]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021T140225]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a soft sensing model based on DSFA and RF to monitor the concentration of particulate matter in metro station air more stably. The model shows better prediction performance than traditional models and performs well in health risk assessment.
The indoor air quality of a metro station is closely related to the health of passengers. In order to monitor the concentration of particulate matter in the air more stably and reduce the monitoring cost, a soft sensing model based on dynamic slow feature analysis (DSFA) and random forest (RF) is proposed in this paper. First, the augmented matrix technique is embedded into the slow feature analysis model to create a DSFA model to cope with the time lag inherent in the actual measurement process. Then, the constructed DSFA model is used to extract slowly varying latent variables to capture the dynamic trend within the input data. Finally, taking the latent variables as the input and aiming at the nonlinearity in the data, RF is used to predict the particle concentration. The results show that the prediction performance of the DSFA-RF model is better than some traditional soft sensor models, including partial least squares, support vector regression, single RF, and a hybrid model. The root mean square error value of DSFA-RF is improved by 21.93% compared with the hybrid model based on principal component analysis and support vector regression. In addition, DSFA also outperforms in health risk assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据