4.7 Review

Spindle Assembly and Mitosis in Plants

期刊

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 227-254

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-070721-084258

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB-1920358]
  2. US Department of Agriculture hatch grant [CA-D-PLB-2536-H]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant cells assemble bipolar spindles with plasticity, lacking microtubule-organizing centers found in fungal and animal cells. They utilize evolutionarily conserved proteins to regulate spindle morphogenesis and produce novel proteins to control critical events during mitosis. Understanding the mitotic functions of these proteins will shed light on common and divergent mechanisms employed by different eukaryotic organisms.
In contrast to well-studied fungal and animal cells, plant cells assemble bipolar spindles that exhibit a great deal of plasticity in the absence of structurally defined microtubule-organizing centers like the centrosome. While plants employ some evolutionarily conserved proteins to regulate spindle morphogenesis and remodeling, many essential spindle assembly factors found in vertebrates are either missing or not required for producing the plant bipolar microtubule array. Plants also produce proteins distantly related to their fungal and animal counterparts to regulate critical events such as the spindle assembly checkpoint. Plant spindle assembly initiates with microtubule nucleation on the nuclear envelope followed by bipolarization into the prophase spindle. After nuclear envelope breakdown, kinetochore fibers are assembled and unified into the spindle apparatus with convergent poles. Of note, compared to fungal and animal systems, relatively little is known about how plant cells remodel the spindle microtubule array during anaphase. Uncovering mitotic functions of novel proteins for spindle assembly in plants will illuminate both common and divergent mechanisms employed by different eukaryotic organisms to segregate genetic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据