4.3 Article

Fast and Non-Invasive Medical Diagnostic Using Mid Infrared Sensor The AMNIFIR Project

期刊

IRBM
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 116-123

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2016.03.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. French National Research Agency TECSAN program [ANR-12-TECS-0012-01]
  2. French National Association Research Technology [ANRT-CIFRE 2013/1015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Amnifir project, part of the ANR TECSAN program, intended to assess the capabilities of a new Mid InfraRed spectroscopy (MIR) device. It used a simple fiber optic sampling method: Fiber Evanescent Wave Spectroscopy (FEWS), which makes Point of Care applications possible and delivers a result within a few minutes. Material and method: To investigate the technology application range, different biological media (tissues, fluids) as well as pathologies (chronic, cancerous) were considered during the project. We present work on one cancer diagnostic, measuring tissues (colorectal polyp examination), and one chronic disease diagnostic, using a fluid sample (Non-Alcoholic SteatoHepatitis (NASH) markers in serum). We used specific FEWS sensors for both cases, made of chalcogenide infrared glass fiber, as well as proper signal analysis algorithm that first selected spectra area of interest by genetic algorithm, then discriminated the healthy population from the sick one by linear discriminant analysis. Results: Measurements using liquid samples provide very encouraging results for NASH identification. On other hand, fiber sensor proved more difficult to use on tissues, as the fiber mechanical resistance appeared too low to sustain a contact with the hardest polyps. Conclusions: AMNIFIR project demonstrated capabilities of MIR FEWS for medical diagnostic using biological fluids, leading to recruitments of further cohorts of NASH and other hepatic disorders patients. Mechanical resistance of fiber needs to be improved for tissues diagnostics. (C) 2016 AGBM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据