4.3 Article

A Novel Predictor of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Carotid Artery Disease; the Systemic Immune Inflammation Index

期刊

ANGIOLOGY
卷 73, 期 8, 页码 781-787

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00033197211061919

关键词

systemic immune inflammation index; carotid artery disease; contrast-induced nephropathy; carotid artery angiography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) can predict the risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after carotid artery angiography (CAAG). Factors such as glucose levels, cholesterol levels, and blood cell counts were found to be associated with the development of CIN. The SII levels were independently associated with the development of CIN after CAAG in patients with carotid artery stenosis.
Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The present study investigated the role of systemic immune inflammation index (SII) in predicting the risk of developing CIN after carotid artery angiography (CAAG). This study included 262 patients who underwent CAAG for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (CAS). Simultaneous carotid stenting was applied to 232 of these patients. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level >=.5 mg/dL or >= 25% above baseline within 72 hours after the procedure. The SII score was calculated as platelet x neutrophil/lymphocyte counts. Patients who developed CIN, had higher glucose (P = .009), total cholesterol (P < .001), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (<.001), and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (P = .001) levels, as well as greater neutrophil counts (P < .001), platelet counts (P < .001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (P < .001), and SII score (P < .001) than those who did not develop CIN. The Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis showed that at a cutoff of 519.9, the SII exhibited 80% sensitivity and 64% specificity for detecting CIN. SII levels on admission were independently associated with CIN development after CAAG in patients with CAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据