4.4 Article

Ibalizumab shows in-vitro activity against group A and group B HIV-2 clinical isolates

期刊

AIDS
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 1055-1060

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003218

关键词

entry inhibitor; HIV-2; ibalizumab; phenotypic susceptibility; resistance

资金

  1. ANRSjMIE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine the susceptibility of HIV-2 primary isolates to ibalizumab. The results showed that ibalizumab can inhibit the replication of HIV-2, supporting its use in the treatment of multidrug-resistant HIV-2 patients.
Objective: Treatment of multidrug-resistant HIV-2 is an emerging issue, because of the rapid selection of mutations at time of virological failure and the low number of antiretrovirals active on HIV-2. The aim of this study was to determine the susceptibility of HIV-2 primary isolates to ibalizumab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody that binds to CD4 that is approved for the treatment of MDR HIV-1. Methods: In-vitro phenotypic susceptibility of 16 HIV-2 primary isolates was measured using a modified version of the ANRS peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) assay. Susceptibility to ibalizumab was assessed through 50% inhibitory concentrations and maximum percentage inhibitions (MPI), and gp105 was sequenced to look for determinants of reduced susceptibility. Results: Ibalizumab inhibited viral replication of all 16 isolates, with a median IC50 value of 0.027 mu g/ml (range = 0.001-0.506 mu g/ml), and a median MPI of 93%. Although two isolates presented higher IC50 (above 0.1 mu g/ml), they did not exhibit a loss of potential N-linked glycosylation sites in V5 loop, as reported in HIV-1 strains with reduced susceptibility. However, both presented shorter V1 and V2 loops than the HIV-2 reference strain. Conclusion: Ibalizumab inhibits HIV-2 replication, with IC50 and MPI in the range of those reported for HIV-1. These in vitro data support the use of ibalizumab in patients with MDR HIV-2, in combination with an optimized background regimen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据