4.6 Article

Simultaneous reconstruction and segmentation for dynamic SPECT imaging

期刊

INVERSE PROBLEMS
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/32/10/104002

关键词

dynamic SPECT; sparsity; image reconstruction; Bregman distance; Kullback-Leibler; total variation

资金

  1. Heinrich Hertz Foundation
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. German Science Foundation DFG [BU 2327/6-1]
  4. ERC [615216]
  5. Sino-German Center [GZ1025]
  6. 973 program [2015CB856004]
  7. [NSFC91330102]
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [615216] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work deals with the reconstruction of dynamic images that incorporate characteristic dynamics in certain subregions, as arising for the kinetics of many tracers in emission tomography (SPECT, PET). We make use of a basis function approach for the unknown tracer concentration by assuming that the region of interest can be divided into subregions with spatially constant concentration curves. Applying a regularised variational framework reminiscent of the Chan-Vese model for image segmentation we simultaneously reconstruct both the labelling functions of the subregions as well as the sub-concentrations within each region. Our particular focus is on applications in SPECT with the Poisson noise model, resulting in a Kullback-Leibler data fidelity in the variational approach. We present a detailed analysis of the proposed variational model and prove existence of minimisers as well as error estimates. The latter apply to a more general class of problems and generalise existing results in literature since we deal with a nonlinear forward operator and a nonquadratic data fidelity. A computational algorithm based on alternating minimisation and splitting techniques is developed for the solution of the problem and tested on appropriately designed synthetic data sets. For those we compare the results to those of standard EM reconstructions and investigate the effects of Poisson noise in the data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据