4.4 Article

Rhizobium puerariae sp nov., an endophytic bacterium from the root nodules of the medicinal plant Pueraria candollei var. candollei

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000863

关键词

-

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee PhD Program [PHD/0302/2551]
  2. Office of the High Education Commission
  3. Mahidol University under the National Research Universities Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Gram-stain-negative, rod-shaped, motile bacterium, PC004(T), was isolated from root nodules of the Thai medicinal plant Pueraria candollei var. candollei. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that the strain is phylogenetically related to species in the genus Rhizobium, showing highest similarity (96.6 %) with Rhizobium mesosinicum HAMBI 3194(T). The phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain PC004(T) forms a cluster with Rhizobium petrolearium KCTC 23288(T). Based on atpD, gyrB and recA gene sequences, strain PC004(T) also showed low similarity (, 90 %) to reference strains. These phylogenetic data indicate that PC004(T) may represent a novel species. Strain PC004T also exhibited low DNA-DNA relatedness with R. mesosinicum HAMBI 3194(T) (8.2 %) and R. petrolearium KCTC 23288(T) (26.3 %). The DNA G + C content of strain PC004(T) was 64 mol%, which is within the range reported for the genus Rhizobium. The major fatty acid of PC004(T) was C-18 : 1 omega 7c with minor amounts of C-16 : 0, C-16 : 0 3-OH, C-18 : 0 3-OH, C-18 : 1 2-OH, C-19 : 0 cyclo omega 8c and summed feature 2. The strain was able to grow at pH 12 and with up to 2 % (w/v) NaCl. Strain PC004(T) did not nodulate five tested legumes and the nifH and nodC genes were not detected by PCR. Based on the physiological, chemotaxonomic and phenotypic data from this study, strain PC004(T) represents a novel species of the genus Rhizobium, for which the name Rhizobium puerariae sp. nov. is proposed; the type strain is PC004(T) (=BCC 73740(T) =NBRC 110722(T)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据