4.4 Article

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients' Participation, Attitude and Preferences Toward Exercise

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 665-670

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-103244

关键词

Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis; Behcet's disease; physical activity

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2015S1A5B8036349]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015S1A5B8036349] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of the study was to investigate the level of exercise participation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to investigate their intention, attitude and preference toward exercise. The data of 158 IBD patients that participated in a self-administered survey at Severance Hospital between March 2013 and November 2013 were included in this cross sectional and descriptive analysis. Questionnaires included 3 sections to determine the IBD patient's current exercise participation, attitude toward exercise, and exercise preferences. This study investigated IBD patients both collectively, and according to their specific disease: Crohn's disease (CD) (n = 62), Ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 73) and intestinal Behcet's disease (BD) (n = 23). IBD patients currently participate in 103 min/week of exercise including mild, moderate and strenuous intensity, with BD patients being the least active, followed by CD, and UC being most active. The majority of IBD patients found exercise to be pleasant (57.7 %), beneficial (80.5 %), sensible (71.8 %), uplifting (61 %) and good (70.5 %), and 44.4 % found exercise to be enjoyable. This study shows the IBD patients' participation, attitude and preferences toward exercise and provides much needed information for the development of evidence based exercise programs that are specific to IBD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据