4.5 Article

Jatropha curcas and assisted phytoremediation of a mine tailing with biochar and a mycorrhizal fungus

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 174-182

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2016.1207602

关键词

Acaulospora sp; heavy metals; physic nut; phytostabilization; translocation factor

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT)
  2. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in the production of Jatropha curcas L. for bioenergy [167304]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil pollution is an important ecological problem worldwide. Phytoremediation is an environmental-friendly option for reducing metal pollution. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to determine the growth and physiological response, metal uptake, and the phytostabilization potential of a nontoxic Jatropha curcas L. genotype when grown in multimetal-polluted conditions. Plants were established on a mine residue (MR) amended or not amended with corn biochar (B) and inoculated or not inoculated with the mycorrhizal fungus Acaulospora sp. (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, AMF). J. curcas was highly capable of growing in an MR and showed no phytotoxic symptoms. After J. curcas growth (105 days), B produced high desorption of Cd and Pb from the MR; however, no increases in metal shoot concentrations were observed. Therefore, Jatropha may be useful for phytostabilization of metals in mine tailings. The use of B is recommended because improved MR chemical properties conduced to plant growth (cation-exchange capacity, organic matter content, essential nutrients, electrical conductivity, water-holding capacity) and plant growth development (higher biomass, nutritional and physiological performance). Inoculation with an AMF did not improve any plant growth or physiological plant characteristic. Only higher Zn shoot concentration was observed, but it was not phytotoxic. Future studies of B use and its long-term effect on MR remediation should be conducted under field conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据