4.2 Article

Stakeholder Views on Engagement, Trust, Performance, and Risk Considerations About Use of Gene Drive Technology in Agricultural Pest Management

期刊

HEALTH SECURITY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 6-15

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/hs.2021.0101

关键词

Gene drive; Community engagement; Trust; Product performance; Risk concerns

资金

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2018-67023-27676, 1015199]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene drive is an experimental technique that can alter the genetic traits of whole populations through genetic modification of a small number of individuals. In Texas, most agricultural stakeholders support gene drive technology for managing agricultural pests and emphasize the importance of stakeholder and public engagement in addressing related issues.
Gene drive is an experimental technique that may make it possible to alter the genetic traits of whole populations of a species through the genetic modification of a relatively small number of individuals. This technology is sufficiently new that literature on the understanding and views of stakeholders and the public regarding the use of gene drive organisms in agricultural pest management is just beginning to emerge. Our team conducted a 2-pronged engagement process with Texas gene drive agricultural stakeholders to ascertain their values, beliefs, and preferences about the efficacy, safety, and risk management considerations of gene drive technology as a potential tool for agricultural pest management. We found that a majority of stakeholders support gene drive research and its potential use for managing agricultural pests. Our work with stakeholders confirms both their willingness to be engaged and the importance they place on stakeholder and public engagement regarding these issues, as well as the need to address these issues before use of gene drive as a pest management mechanism will be accepted and trusted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据