4.2 Article

Cytotoxic CD4+ T cells are correlated with better prognosis in Han Chinese grade II and grade III glioma subjects and are suppressed by PD-1 signaling

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 127, 期 5, 页码 386-395

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2016.1180597

关键词

cytotoxic CD4(+) T cell; glioma; PD-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Malignant gliomas are the most common tumors in the central nervous system with a poor prognosis. Recently, CD4(+) cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) are being increasingly recognized as possessing antitumor capacity. However, their presence, activity and regulation in glioma have not been investigated in detail. Methods: To examine this, 72 grade II and grade III Han Chinese glioma patients and 30 Han Chinese healthy controls were investigated. Results: We found that compared to healthy controls, glioma patients had significantly upregulated frequencies of circulating CD4(+) CTLs, identified by the expression of granzyme A (GzmA), granzyme B (GzmB) and/ or perforin. The stimulated CD4(+) CTLs in grade II and grade III glioma patients also had less proliferative ability than those in healthy controls, a feature of suppression that progressed with tumor grade. The frequencies of GzmB-expressing circulating CD4(+) CTLs were directly associated with prognosis. We hypothesized that the programed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 (L1) interaction possibly contributed to the suppression of CD4(+) CTLs in grade II and grade III glioma, since an upregulation of PD-1 was observed on CD4(+) CTLs in glioma compared to those in the healthy individuals. Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction with neutralizing antibodies significantly increased the proliferation and granzyme or perforin production by CD4(+) CTLs in grade II and grade III glioma patients. Conclusions: These data suggest that the CD4(+) CTLs in grade II and grade III glioma patients contribute to antitumor immunity and could be suppressed by PD-1 signal transduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据