3.8 Article

Selective Toxicity Effect of Fatty Acids Omega-3, 6 and 9 Combination on Glioblastoma Neurons through their Mitochondria

期刊

DRUG RESEARCH
卷 72, 期 2, 页码 94-99

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-1640-8561

关键词

Anticancer; Reactive Oxygen Species; Oxidative Stress; Apoptosis; Cytochrome c

资金

  1. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of omega 3, 6 and 9 was found to induce selective toxicity in mitochondria of U87MG human glioma cells, leading to reduced SDH activity and increased ROS levels. These effects were not observed in mitochondria from normal HEK293 cells.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most common malignant tumors of the central nervous system that occurs in the brain and is a deadly disease. Despite the different approaches to the treatment of this malignancy, the discovery of new compounds with anti-cancer effects seems necessary. In this study, the selective toxicity effects of omega 3, 6 and 9 combinations on mitochondria isolated from U87MG human glioma cells and also human embryonic kidney 293 cells (HEK293) as normal control were investigated. The results indicated that the omega 3, 6 and 9 combinations significantly reduced succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity only in mitochondria isolated from U87MG human glioma cells. Additionally, exposure of mitochondria isolated from U87MG human glioma cells to this combination was associated with a selective increase in the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), the collapse of the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), mitochondrial swelling and cytochrome c release. However, these effects were not observed in mitochondria isolated from HEK293 cells (as a normal group). According to results, it is proposed that the combination of omega 3, 6 and 9 could induce toxicity in U87MG human glioma cells through their mitochondria. This combination can be helpful as a complementary therapy in patients with GBM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据