4.1 Article

E26 transformation-specific 1 is implicated in the inhibition of osteogenic differentiation induced by chronic high glucose by directly regulating Runx2 expression

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 39-47

出版社

NANJING MEDICAL UNIV
DOI: 10.7555/JBR.35.20210123

关键词

ETS1; Runx2; chronic high glucose; osteoblast; differentiation; proliferation

资金

  1. Nantong City Basic Research and People's Livelihood Science and Technology Plan Guiding Project [JCZ21133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that ETS1 is involved in the inhibitory effect of chronic high glucose on osteoblast differentiation and proliferation, indicating its potential as a therapeutic target for diabetes-induced osteoporosis.
Chronic high glucose (HG) plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of diabetes-induced osteoporosis by inhibiting the differentiation and proliferation of osteoblasts. This study aims to examine the role of E26 transformation-specific 1 (ETS1) in the inhibition of osteoblast differentiation and proliferation caused by chronic HG, as well as the underlying mechanism. Chronic HG treatment downregulated ETS1 expression and inhibited differentiation and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells. Downregulation of ETS1 expression inhibited the differentiation and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells under normal glucose conditions, and ETS1 overexpression attenuated the damage to cells exposed to chronic HG. In addition, ETS1 overexpression reversed the decrease in runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) expression in MC3T3-E1 cells treated with chronic HG. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and luciferase reporter assays, we confirmed that ETS1 directly bound to and increased the activity of the Runx2 promoter. In summary, our study suggested that ETS1 was involved in the inhibitory effect of chronic HG on osteogenic differentiation and proliferation and may be a potential therapeutic target for diabetes-induced osteoporosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据