3.8 Article

African American participation in cancer clinical trials

期刊

ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CANCER INTELLIGENCE LTD
DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1307

关键词

cancer; clinical trials; African American; minority

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [R25CA21422]
  2. National Institute of Health (NIH) [U54CA233444]
  3. University of Florida's ReTOOL Program [1R25CA214225-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reasons for the lower participation rate of African Americans in cancer clinical trials often involve provider related issues, family concerns, health literacy and trust. Successful interventions to improve African American participation or address barriers typically revolve around community based participatory research and educational cancer clinical trial videos/tools.
Background: According to the Food and Drug Administration, African Americans (AAs) have been habitually underrepresented in cancer clinical trials (CCTs). This under-enrolment has contributed to cancer disparities despite the implementation of policies to improve AA accrual. This systematic review aimed to determine (1) Why AAs are participating in CCT at lower rates compared to other ethnic/racial groups and (2) Are there any tools that have definitively improved AA participation or addressed the barriers associated with their lack of participation. Methods: Searches were carried out in PubMed, Project MUSE and EBSCO which were confined to four databases (BASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and MEDLINE). Literature published between 2010 and 2020 were filtered with the inclusion and exclusion criteria and then a mixed methods appraisal tool was used to check the quality of the articles. Studies were separated into two categories to extract and synthesise data based on the emerging themes. Results: Frequent reasons for a lack of participation involved provider related issues, family concerns, health literacy and trust among others. Interventions cited as successful in improving AA participation or addressing a barrier often revolved around community based participatory research and educational CCT videos/tools. Recommendations/Conclusion: Educating AA patients about the biomedical research process, addressing concerns about CCTs, building trust with community members and improving communication with healthcare providers could improve AA participation in CCTs. Future interventions should consider the effect of diversified healthcare teams in addressing trust deficit in CCTs among AAs. Healthcare practitioners seeking to consent AA into CCTs and biomedical research could consider incorporating cultural competence into their practice for effective interaction with this population and to address their questions about biomedical research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据