4.4 Article

Mind Wandering Outside the Box-About the Role of Off-Task Thoughts and Their Assessment During Creative Incubation

期刊

出版社

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/aca0000373

关键词

mind wandering; task-unrelated thought; creativity; incubation

资金

  1. German research foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [RU1996/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to test the positive effects of mind wandering during incubation phases on subsequent divergent-thinking performance, and to investigate the impact of online thought probes on incubation thought processes. Results showed that participants reported fewer task-related thoughts in the condition with thought probes, but divergent thinking performance did not significantly differ between the different incubation conditions.
The present study was designed to conceptually replicate and to further test previous findings that have shown a beneficial influence of mind wandering during incubation phases on postincubation divergent-thinking performance. Additionally, online thought probes and the effects their occurrence might have on incubation thought processes were investigated. Participants worked on verbal and figural divergent-thinking tasks. In one condition, their thoughts were probed during an incubation interval, possibly interrupting and/or making aware creative thought processes. Participants in this condition retrospectively reported fewer thoughts concerning the divergent-thinking tasks compared to two other incubation conditions: that is, one without interruption and one interrupted by trivia questions. Divergent thinking did not differ between these three incubation conditions and all three incubation conditions achieved a similar performance as a no-incubation control condition. These results add to the ongoing discussion regarding the relationship between mind wandering and creativity by challenging the idea of mind-wandering states contributing to a creative-incubation process in divergent-thinking tasks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据