4.5 Article

Innovational duality and sustainable development: finding optima amidst socio-ecological policy trade-off in post-COVID-19 era

期刊

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-06-2021-0278

关键词

Innovation; SDG; COVID; CO2 emissions; Unemployment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes the policy trade-off caused by technological innovations in the post-COVID-19 era. It found conflicting impacts of innovation on environmental quality and unemployment, leading to a need for careful policy recommendations. The study provides insights for designing an SDG-oriented policy framework to address these challenges.
Purpose This study aims to analyze the socio-ecological policy trade-off caused by technological innovations in the post-COVID-19 era. The study outcomes are utilized to design a comprehensive policy framework for attaining sustainable development goals (SDGs). Design/methodology/approach Study is done for 100 countries over 1991-2019. Second-generation estimation method is used. Innovation is measured by total factor productivity, environmental quality is measured by carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and social dimension is captured by unemployment. Findings Innovation-CO2 emissions association is found to be inverted U-shaped and innovation-unemployment association is found to be U-shaped. Research limitations/implications The study outcomes show the conflicting impact of technological innovation leading to policy trade-off. This dual impact of innovation is considered during policy recommendation. Practical implications The policy framework recommended in the study shows a way to address the objectives of SDG 8, 9 and 13 during post-COVID-19 period. Social implications Policy recommendations in the study show a way to internalize the negative social externality exerted by innovation. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by considering the policy trade-off caused by innovation and recommending an SDG-oriented policy framework for the post-COVID-19 era.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据